GHOSTNET
Platform Capabilities

Defence you can check

Every claim below is a number this system publishes about itself, measured from its own live traffic.

Measured, not asserted

Most security products tell you they are fast and accurate. These are the actual figures, recomputed continuously from the tamper-evident audit ledger.

20s
Median time to block
269s
90th percentile
80.4%
Blocked within a minute
0%
False positive rate

Service level objectives

Published targets, and whether they are currently being met. A defence that reports its own misses is making a checkable claim rather than a marketing one.

Time to ban (p50) met 20s / target 60s
Time to ban (p90) met 269s / target 300s
False positive rate met 0% / target 1%

Analysed live, while being defended against

When an intrusion attempt is graded critical, it is not simply dropped. It is engaged, every action is recorded, and an analyst-grade write-up is produced automatically — while the source is being blocked. These are real figures from that programme.

1
Intrusions analysed
4
Attacker actions recorded
0.5
Attacker minutes consumed
3
Distinct techniques seen

What they actually try

Ranked by how often it has been observed here, not by a vendor taxonomy.

credential access1
tool download1
scheduled task enumeration1

Most recent analyses

SourceCountryActionsHeldAssessment
45.134.26.x Netherlands 4 30.8s Attacker attempted to exfiltrate credentials and deploy a cryptocurrency miner.

Sources are masked to /24. Transcripts are never published.

What the platform does

Live honeypot network
A spread of decoy services absorbs hostile traffic before it reaches anything real. 98,512 incursions recorded to date.
Client fingerprinting
Attackers are identified by their tooling rather than their address, so rotating through a new IP pool does not buy them a fresh start. 908 signatures blacklisted.
AI payload classification
Every capture is graded automatically — reconnaissance, brute force, active exploitation — so nobody reads logs looking for the one that mattered.
Autonomous blocking
Confirmed hostile sources are cut off at the network layer in seconds, with shared infrastructure protected so a block never costs you legitimate visitors.
Campaign correlation
Individual events are grouped into the operators behind them. 161 distinct campaigns identified — one of them spanning hundreds of addresses that share a handful of signatures.
Reputation scoring
Sources carry a running score from their own history. A confirmed-hostile connection is turned away at the door rather than handed a puzzle.
Generated detection rules
76 Sigma rules for your SIEM and 27 YARA rules for payload matching, written from real observed traffic — not a generic feed — and regenerated as campaigns evolve.
Standards-based sharing
Indicators export as STIX 2.1 (1,676 objects) and MISP events (161), so the intelligence drops into platforms you already run.
Tamper-evident ledger
Every classification and block is hash-chained to the one before it. Alter a record and the break shows up on the integrity check.
Human verification at the edge
Important pages are gated behind a real challenge, verified server-side, on every site the platform fronts.
Threat intelligence API
A documented, key-based feed of confirmed malicious sources and signatures, with quotas, for protecting your own stack.
Always-on supervision
Every critical process is watched and restarted automatically, with an AI-written incident report if one stays down.

Built on real traffic

  • Rules generated from attacks this system actually received.
  • Figures recomputed from a tamper-evident ledger.
  • Objectives published, including when they are missed.
  • Indicators exported in formats your tools already read.

Not included, on purpose

  • Detection thresholds and internal mechanisms.
  • Which services run where, and on what.
  • Payload bodies — the rules carry the distinguishing bytes instead.
  • Anything that would tell an attacker how to slip past.

Start blocking what
we have already caught.

Get API access